www.humanunderground.com
I hope it is understood that I mean no disrespect to the grieving loved ones of those lost on Flight 77 and at the Pentagon on S-11. I respect your hardships fully. I feel that I should make a small statement here since this is getting some rather heavy traffic. I began this project in response to the Hunt the Boeing site, a French research effort into curiosities regarding the Pentagon crash site and the 'official line'. I was intrigued, but offended by the hostile tone of the presentation. I felt I had some more benign theories to answer complicated questions of my own. I began discussing them on the American Patriot Friends Network since that's where I learned of the French site. It's been non-stop since that moment. The suspicious timing of the Pentagon data release, within just hours of the developing discussions on APFN is rather curious.
I expect input and contributions from visitors.
mailto:news@humanunderground.com
There is indication that there exists actual home-video shot and aired on the news the day of the event showing a Boeing 757, presumably Flight 77, flying and impacting the Pentagon. I accept my theory being defeated - Please help me see this video; I can't find it. -Thanks in advance
This is a work in progress
enjoy...
Questions like this kept me out of the good schools.
What is implied is that opportunities for deception will be seized if it serves a purpose. The purpose, to hide a captured airliner with terrorists on board.
Unless shown otherwise, we will continue to operate under the assumption that the original theory is accurate, mainly Flight 77 was clandestinely recovered, the terrorists captured and the civilians under a 'witness-protection' program.
FOX News aired a special on S-11, as it happened I don't have the reporters' names, but here are the quoted notes I took regarding the situation in DC as S-11 was unlodling
"Sharpshooters with anti-aircraft missiles are on the White House (roof). ...plane perhaps going down... another large airliner apparently... not sure whether an aircraft..."
Something hit the Pentagon, the stories and theories are plenty, but we think that there was a legitimate accident there, which gave a CONVENIENT cover to the fact that Flight 77 was 'missing/recovered'. A new element I discovered indicates there were 'escorts' reported in the area. If it turns out to actually be Flight 77 that was responsible for the Pentagon event then I will revise my postings as just an anatomy of an investigation with the truth and the path to it for all to check out... Elements of the official story are well known. Tough questions - raw data for raw nerves...
Here are a set of dramatic Pentagon shots. The first is from Life Magazine's The Year in Pictures September 11, 2001 Before and After, p.80-81, credit to Daryl Donley/Sipa. What do we see? To the left - blast debris and effects. To the right - enclosed area with truck and major smoking. The middle - main fire region with what look like 4 curiously undisturbed cable spools. What we don't see - a Boeing 757.
Next, an Image found online, with AP credit to Will Morris. What do we see? Plenty of blast and debris effects, a burning car in the foreground with looks like an 'astro-van' or some sort of SUV engulfed in smoke behind. What we don't see - a Boeing 757.
Next, an image from the same .mil server as the wide shot of the Pentagon above http://jccc.afis.osd.mil/images/images.pl?Lbox=defenselink.Pentagon_Attack check it out - you can download some very high resolution and quality images. Anyway, I just wanted to illustrate a different angle of view for the blast effect. If you look near the bottom, left of the vertical water stream and first responders, there are some heavily damaged support structure beams twisted like branches, maybe wing structure? (easier to see on the high res version, see zoom below). Not quite sure what that's part of, but I still don't see any Boeing 757 wreckage.
This is the debris field to the left of impact/collapse zone, claimed to be the final remains of Flight-77, I see file cabinets, desks and stuff and assume this is internal matter from the building - yes there were people working in there, so I expect careful recovery crews. (I think the impact happened to the 'RIGHT' of the collapse zone. The angle'd nature of the impact, having momentum to the left, with respect to the normal of the Pentagon face, would throw debris to the left with general compromise of the structure to the left. The dynamics seem consistent, but someone will correct me if I'm wrong.)
This is the truck enclosure that was burning above
The full-size image can be accessed at: http://www.defenselink.mil/photos/Sep2001/010914-F-8006R-002.jpg
Imaged
on September 14 by the USAF¼s Tech. Sgt. Cedric Rudisill
View some more very high res close-ups of the damage
Quit Hell!!: don't know what it means - note:
the men working underground (right end) - I figure with the empty cable spools
and all, that underground construction was uderway in the area.
Below we see an image from one of the Frenchi research sites with an overlay
Below we see the before and after zoom of the object in motion. We can see the white smoke/dust trailing behind the object in both pictures. Damage? or kicking up dust from the ground, being so low? Looks like it did hit the Pentagon at an angle, but the path looks level, and almost in flat lateral motion with respect to the image plane of the camera, maybe 30 degs or under. Right, is a .gif animation of the frame sequence submitted by Dave Bosankoe http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/).
3 pt. view of Boeing 757-200
Just for fun, I ran a websearch on DRAGONFIRE since the .gov mentioned it as a code-word
The Pentagon: Official Picture
I read with interest your [APFN] article titled: Military Video Of Flt 77 Hitting Pentagon - Critics See No Plane (an rense.com) You'll be interested to know that I was watching the events of 911 on tv, live and Dan Rather (could have been Peter Jennings) had an eyewitness to the plane that allegedly hit the pentagon. He clearly stated that it was a small commuter plane like a cessna 172 or a small private jet. Soon after all the news media reported flight 77 had hit the pentagon and this EYEWITNESS' testimony was never even brought up again. If I was a reporter even worth a dime I would call this eyewitness back and at least verify what he in fact saw. But they never did. To my knowledge, he's never been talked to since. I'm not saying it WAS this low flying small plane that hit the Pentagon, or even that it's not flight 77. I'm just saying it's curious that they didn't even ask the question that morning of WHY there was apparent confusion between the eyewitnesses and the government position (that flight 77 hit the Pentagon). Of course if flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon, then where is it? Was it shot down elsewhere? Anyways, thanks for the article... Dave "Dave Nesbitt" - dnesbitt@postmark.net
Cessna 172 - FAA
Aging Aircraft
Below we see a piece of wreckage claimed to be from Flight 77, credit to Mike Faram from Navy Times
There is some discussion going on regarding more video footage from other cameras in the area, confiscated by the FBI. This is coming from Gertz File My response is we will never get to see 'clearer' footage of the event UNLESS it was actually Flight 77 that is responsible for the event. Conjecture is, they won't produce anything because there was no Flight 77 imaged near the Pentagon. Again; if Flight 77's transponder was off, then what evidence do we have that it was, in fact Flight 77 that caused the Pentagon event?
Flight 77, the only flight to turn its transponder off and follow a curious and structured flight path
A fully integrated flight management computer system (FMCS) provides for automatic guidance and control of the 757-200 from immediately after takeoff to final approach and landing. Linking together digital processors controlling navigation, guidance and engine thrust, the flight management system ensures that the aircraft flies the most efficient route and flight profile for reduced fuel consumption, flight time and crew workload. The precision of global positioning satellite system (GPS) navigation, automated air traffic control functions, and advanced guidance and communications features are now available as part of the new Future Air Navigation System (FANS) flight management computer.
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) USE FOR ALL-WEATHER LANDINGS The aviation industry is investigating the use of differential GPS concepts for precision landings in bad weather to improve the safety and reliability of air travel. The GPS is a constellation of 24 satellites used to determine aircraft position anywhere on or near the Earth. When a ground-based GPS receiver is used to provide a 'differential' correction signal, an aircraft©ñs position can be determined within a foot or two. Boeing partnered with NASA to examine GPS Landing System concepts and evaluate their accuracy, integrity, and continuity of function in automatic landings of airplanes. The team tested several prototype GPS Landing System concepts using NASA 557 during 226 automatic approaches and landings. The data obtained is being used to validate GPS Landing System simulations and to define system certification requirements.
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/WTC_suspects.html
The following have been named as the men who hijacked AA Flight 77, which left Washington's Dulles International Airport bound for Los Angeles before being flown into the Pentagon.
On Firday, 21 December 2001, it was made public that a tape had been recovered with bin Laden naming hijackers, including the Alhazmi brothers of Flight 77 (but one of them is reported alive?). I Don't know when the tape was discovered or produced, but I do know the US was pissed off enough about something to start dropping 'daisy-cutters' on the 10th of December. This tape might have been further evidence linking the 'captured' terrorists to the operations of bin Laden further justifying an escalation. Then on Christmas, 2 weeks after the 'daisy-cutter' bombardments of the Tora-Bora region, reports of Osama's death start filtering over the net. A couple days later, on the 27th, Al-jazeera network broadcasts the last known legitimate bin Laden video.
Initial websurvey for info
-WITSEC: Inside the Federal Witness Protection
Program by Pete Early, Gerald Shur
Whitehouse News Release 020105
Anyway, I was sitting there, and my Chief of Staff -- well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on. And you know, I thought it was pilot error and I was amazed that anybody could make such a terrible mistake. And something was wrong with the plane, or -- anyway, I'm sitting there, listening to the briefing, and Andy Card came and said, "America is under attack."
Eight of the world's most controversial speakers will convene in the Bay Area on May 25 and 26, 2002 (Memorial Day weekend) for CONSPIRACY CON 2002.
The conference, open to the public, will be held at Santa Clara Marriott Hotel in Santa Clara, California.
The speakers are: Col. Bo Gritz, Nick Begich, Norio Hayakawa, Ted L. Gunderson, Anthony J. Hilder, Walter Bowart, Eustace Mullins and Eric Phelps.
There will also be panel discussions, slides, vides and exhibits.
For more formation: http://www.conspiracycon.com/
YOU GUYS ROCK!!! THANK YOU FOR THE ENERGY YOU PUT IN FOR THE TRUTH!
In the
hope we can kick the chess board over once and for all..
This Site
Recommended By Backwash.com
W3 page maintained by The Eschatus
Discussion at Backwash